Monday, 4 September 2017

Cinderella - the original pantomime!

Sorting through some old papers I found a brown envelope headed up "On His Majesty's Service" and, in my mother's handwriting, the word "Cinderella".

Memories stirred, must be over 60 years ago at 37 Watcombe Road, Southbourne a play written by me and my brothers to perform for parents and (maybe, I can't remember) close neighbours.

The play was typed on a manual typewriter with handwritten edits on paper which had obviously come home with my father from his work as the back has technical stuff printed, probably on a Gestetner duplicator and a date of 1946!

Our parents obviously treasured our work enough to keep it and reading the pantomime after all these years, it wasn't too bad!

I wonder if my brothers remember and would like a copy .....

Friday, 17 June 2016

Boat snobbery



I have noticed recently that on the forums and Facebook, there is an unsavoury element of “boat snobbery” creeping in at times!
                   
We all know that wood is good, traditional and warm but carries constant maintenance costs with it and some owners of wooden boats have been stung by boatyards when having repairs carried out. Not everyone has the financial means to be involved in the sometimes large charges involved in maintaining a wooden boat.

A number of wooden boat owners carry out maintenance / repair work themselves and those who have the facilities and capabilities to replace planks and rub down and re-varnish are indeed lucky.

However, for a large number of people who want to get on the water, the only option is a “plastic” boat.  There is no reason why a grp boat cannot be kept clean and well maintained but I don’t agree that they should be sneered at because they are not wooden. 

Thursday, 14 April 2016

To stay or go!



I have just spent 10 minutes reading the government leaflet on why I should vote to remain in the EU.  Probably a selfish view to take but I looked at the arguments from my personal point of view and the future of my grandchildren.



I honestly don’t believe that whether the UK joins the euro or not will have a huge impact on us, as ordinary people, nor would the government’s commitment to reduce EU red tape.



I think one of the worrying things about staying is that EU law overrules UK law in a conflict between national law and EU law.  Scary!



I assume that we are still able to trade with the EU, even if we are not a member but how it would affect the many UK companies which are already owned by France, Germany etc, I don’t know.



The government say that by leaving the EU there would be a risk of higher prices of some household goods and would damage living standards.  In a country where there is supposedly “child poverty” already and food banks, how much worse can it get?



The government predicts 10 years of uncertainty if we leave the EU.  Again, it can’t be much worse than the uncertainty we have lived through over the last 10 years and surely there would be some “job creation” for people who would have to “unpick” the relationship with the EU and renegotiate with countries around the world.



On immigration, which seems to be a big issue particularly on the question of benefits, the government say that new migrants “will not have full access to certain benefits until they have worked here for up to four years.”  I think “full” is the operative word here.  I am confused as I understood that child benefit is paid to anyone, migrant or otherwise, if he or she has a child.  A good incentive to come over to the UK to have a child? – I don’t know. 



With more countries, such as Turkey, Serbia, Albania under consideration for membership, I fear that this island will sink!



We as a country pay around £350M a week to the EU budget!  The government says that what this country gets back in “opportunities, job creation and economic security” far outweighs this cost!  I would like to see some statistics on that!



I was in favour of joining the Common Market back in the early 1970’s.  However, the Common Market has evolved into something which controls our decisions more and more and restricts trade with countries such as Australia and the USA.



I need to see some more arguments for/against before I decide but I just hope everyone will vote in this referendum for the sake of their future and that of future generations.




Monday, 4 January 2016

2015 Christmas card analysis



I have defined the categories more strictly this year so a direct comparison with 2014 might not be possible.  Please let me know if you would like more information on any of the categories! 





CATEGORIES
2015


NOVELTY
1


RELIGIOUS
3


SCENERY
3


ASSORTED ANIMALS
10


FATHER CHRISTMAS 
2


CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS 
-


BOATS
4


CHRISTMAS TREES 
4


ROBINS
8


WORDS (e.g. “NOEL”) 
3


CHURCHES
6


XMAS PLANTS
2


SNOWMEN
4


XMAS FOOD
2

Friday, 11 December 2015

Tim's new book



Whilst reading my brother’s new book “Dave Anthony’s Moods: This Obscure Group”, on page 27 I read a paragraph which triggered a memory from my days of still living “at home”, back in the late 1950’s in Bournemouth.  I was probably about 19 years old.



I recall going to a party on the other side of Bournemouth – a group of us used to meet in the bar of a Bournemouth hotel (whose name escapes me) most Saturdays after watching the local rugby matches, and an impromptu party would be established, dependent on whose parents were out I suspect.  I normally declined and got the bus home but this one Saturday decided to go.  I must have rung my parents and I’m sure my father offered to pick me up around 11 pm but whatever had happened I was offered a lift home by one of the boys in our group. This was kind of him as he then had to drive back across the town to get home.



I think it was probably around 2am when we reached my house and I felt it only polite to ask if he would like a coffee before setting off back across Bournemouth.  He accepted and we went into the lounge.  There was no romantic attachment or attraction in the slightest between us and I was genuinely being polite!  Also, bear in mind that the lounge was directly beneath my parents’ bedroom so there would be no hanky panky, even if we were that way inclined.



However, within about 5 minutes of being in the house, my father appeared at the lounge door and ordered the poor young man out of the house. I have a picture in my mind of my father standing there, arm outstretched to the front door, finger pointing as he hustled the poor boy out.  I also have a mental picture of my mother, halfway down the stairs in her dressing gown and hair net, making sure he was gone before berating me for inviting someone of the opposite sex in to the house at that time of night.  I suppose it was their Victorian upbringing but it was very embarrassing at the time. 



I think the young man, whose name was Nigel I recall, avoided me at all costs after that.



PS Tim’s book is available on Amazon 

Tuesday, 21 July 2015

Hoveton Great Broad restoration project

I know I haven't blogged for a long time but I've been so busy having fun that I really haven't had time.  However, I have recently been very involved with a project which has caused outrage in Norfolk and that I and many others feel strongly about!  Please read on ....














The Norfolk & Suffolk Broads are part of the National Parks family and National Parks are for people.

Nearly £2M has been awarded by the Heritage Lottery Fund to Natural England, on behalf of the owners of Hoveton Great Broad to pay for restoring the Broad's water quality.

The Broad has been illegally closed for over 100 years and totally neglected, causing it to silt up and it needs the sediment pumping out to restore the water quality.  When this work is done, there will still be no full public access although a concession of commercial access by canoe to surrounding marshes is to be allowed, which hardly counts as worthwhile public access given the sums of money involved.




A group of us have got together to set up a petition to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport - the Rt Hon John Wittingdale MP (the government department responsible for the Heritage Lottery Fund - did you know it is a 'quango'?) to insist that full public access is reinstated to this Broad once work has been completed.  It's public money, spent on Lottery tickets, and should not be used for private gain.

If you feel able to, please, please sign the petition and pass it on to as many people as you can. Even if you don't know the Broads, it's the principle of giving public money to a project without public access.


The Petition 



These photos were taken in 2008 from a limited 'wild life' walk around the edge of the Broad.

Thanks for reading this far and please, please read the petition and sign if you feel able.

Friday, 27 February 2015

Norfolk Broads - not a National Park?


"The Norfolk & Suffolk Broads in East Anglia, UK are not in the strictest sense a National Park, being run by a separately constituted Broads Authority set up by a special Act of Parliament in 1988 and with a structure in which equal weight must be given to the three interests of conservation, recreation and navigation, but it is generally regarded as being "equivalent to" a national park. It is felt that the move towards the re-branding to “Broads National Park” is the first step towards obtaining full National Park status where the danger is that National Parks are legally obliged to give greater weight to the interests of conservation if there is a conflict with leisure activity (Sandford Principle)."  

The Broads are already a member of the National Parks family but they are so much more than a normal National Park because of the navigation element.

The first paragraph is the description on a Facebook page, which I help to administer, which is aimed at gathering support to object to the re-branding of the Norfolk & Suffolk Broads (known familiarly as the Norfolk Broads) to the "Broads National Park" (known familiarly as BNP!).

The Broads Authority, according to its website "have the important job of looking after the Broads and the interests of the people who live, work and visit here." and additionally "it is a planning authority and has a duty to foster the economic and social well-being of its communities."

Fair enough, but the CEO (whose primary interest is conservation) has had a long term ambition, which has been stated in the Broads Plan 2011 to achieve full national park status by 2030, where "the Broads would be a national park where the public legal rights of navigation continued to be respected and embraced. Though this objective would require primary legislation, members considered this an important ambition in support of the long-term vision."  Not being satisfied with being a "member of the family" the CEO's aim is to make the Broads a full National Park.

He has agreed to give up this ambition in return for being allowed to call the Broads by the name of Broads National Park (BNP) but there will be a new Broads Plan in a year or so where it is anticipated that the ambition will be re-instated as "we've been the BNP for .... years, with no problems, so we're now going to go for full status."  This is why we must all object NOW.

One of the problems is that the members of the Broads Authority quango who voted, are mostly recommended for appointment by the Secretary of State by the CEO himself, so he makes sure that anyone who he recommends is also a supporter of his ambitions or someone who can be easily convinced! 

There are many issues around the Broads Authority CEO and his long term plans but the feeling is that this re-branding, which follows a previous re-branding to "Britain's Magical Waterland" only four years ago is the first step to a back door entry to becoming a full National Park with all the associated dangers to navigation. Certain areas above Potter Heigham bridge would almost certainly be closed to boats and possibly other currently navigable areas as well, as the Broads Authority would then have the power to do this.

Another of the major concerns is the amount of money being wasted by the Broads Authority on using outside consultants to carry out surveys and consultations on the re-branding at a cost of nearly £50k which has to be provided out of the Authority's income which comes from toll-payers (private boaters and hire boat companies - almost 50% of income) and a National Park grant of the remainder.  

This money should be used to maintain the Broads for the enjoyment of all users but is being frittered away on personal objectives, whilst moorings are being closed, boardwalks are being given up, rubbish collections are being stopped and public toilets are being closed.  Whilst not all the responsibility of the Broads Authority, pressure should be put on local councils by them to ensure that these facilities are maintained.  If the Broads are to survive as a magical place to be visited and enjoyed by everyone then the facilities must be in place.

With the help of many friends, I am fronting a petition to try and get enough signatures to confront potential MP's in the forthcoming election on the various subjects which need addressing within the Broads Authority.  It would be great if you felt able to sign it.

Facebook page:
Protect the Broads


ePetition:
ePetition Broad Agreement 

Broads Authority:
BA website